Categories
Public Relations

Module 3: Leadership Application You will participate in one discussion this wee

Module 3: Leadership Application
You will participate in one discussion this week focused on application of principles of leadership, governance and management.
Leadership Application
Using the case study entitled “Code Red: A Public Health Approach to School Gun Violence” in your Rowitz textbook (pg. 600). Imagine that you have been hired as a Prevention Specialist to address school gun violence in your local area. What strategies and principles of leadership would you apply to address the scenario in this case study? Please include specific examples of how you would create a vision, foster collaboration, empower stakeholders, and guide decision-making on this initiative.
Reading: Module 3 Lesson: The Essential Functions of Public Health Leadership Related to Policy Development
Rowitz, L. (2014). Public health leadership: Putting principles into practice. (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Part II: Leadership Applications in Public Health
Peters, D. H. (2014). The application of systems thinking in health: Why use systems thinking? Health Research Policy and Systems, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-51
Module 4: Discussion (required, graded)
You will participate in one discussion this week. There are two different topics presented below, in bolded text. Please choose one of these topics for your discussion this week, address the bullet items under the topic name.
Effective Leadership Communication
What are some of the unique challenges associated with effectively communicating as a public health leader in a group setting?
Building a Collaborative Team
Describe a time when you had a good team experience and when you had a bad team experience.
What factors contributed to each experience?
Did the team achieve the desired outcome? Why or why not?
Reading: Module 4 Lesson: Communication, Teams, and Collaboration
Orton, S.N., Menkens, A.J., & Santos, P. (2011). Public health business planning: A practical guide. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Defining Public Health Entrepreneurial Business Planning
Rowitz, L. (2014). Public health leadership: Putting principles into practice. (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Part IV: Leadership Skills and Competencies

Categories
Public Relations

**please don’t just agree to post but add more to their post that can be discuss

**please don’t just agree to post but add more to their post that can be discussed ***
Classmate 1: Laban: Module 1 Discussion.
Hello Dr. D and Classmates.
Transformational Leadership Theory versus Situational Leadership.
Leadership is the ability to influence others to maximize their efforts to achieve a given goal. In public health, leadership aspects and trend are too fluid to be pinned down on a single quality. Effective leaders establish relationships with others, inspiring and empowering them to work as a team to reach common objectives. Good leaders often thrive when they can convince others to reflect on the issues affecting them jointly. Thus, successful leadership requires productive support and empowerment between leaders and subjects/ workers to facilitate the exchange of ideas. Whenever people work together and exchange skills, they make essential decisions and employ adequate prowess to achieve their full potential and commit to organizational goals and objectives. Healthcare professionals work in different situations full of daily challenges. They require proper decision-making skills and other leadership attributes to overcome the problems and address the health needs of individuals and communities. However, becoming an effective leader is a lifelong process that entails understanding various leadership theories and approaches (Rath, & Conchie, 2013). A leadership theory outlines how persons become leaders, including changing their traits and behavior to improve their leadership skills and abilities. For instance, leadership theories instill solid ethics and high moral standards in individuals aspiring to become future leaders. Public health leaders can apply different leadership theories depending on the uniqueness of the challenges they face. This paper analyzes and compares two leadership theories, transformational leadership theory and situational leadership, and their significance in public health professionals.
Public healthcare should be at the forefront to initiate and facilitate change. They need to influence and empower other healthcare workers to address the health needs of individuals or communities. Transformational leadership theory is a model that inspires leaders to inspire others to realize the goals and success of an organization. According to Rowitz (2014), transformational leaders have the mandate of instilling confidence and raising the morale of their employees to achieve the set goals and objectives. Public health leaders can employ this leadership theory to transform other employees to become dynamic and productive when addressing the health needs of patients and communities. This begins by identifying the strengths and weaknesses of every healthcare worker and guiding them to achieve a shared vision. Generally, transformational leadership theory is inspirational and encourages teamwork. However, this is only achievable when a common goal/ purpose is achieved. In other words, transformational leaders embark on unifying members to work together as a single unit rather than many separate units. This outlines why public health leaders invite different experts, including researchers and medical professionals, to develop mechanisms to reduce disease morbidity and mortality in other parts of the globe.
Unlike transformational leadership theory, which focuses on changing and inspiring others to achieve a goal, situational leadership theory outlines that no single leadership approach is the best. However, every task or situation requires a unique leadership strategy. The proponents of situational leadership theory suggest that leaders should adapt their style to the nature of a given task (Rath, & Conchie, 2013). After identifying the type of task, leaders need to gather all the necessary resources to facilitate the completion of the task. While transformational leadership changes persons to focus on team/ organizational needs rather than individuals, situational leadership calls on leaders to adapt to a team’s needs. As a result, it balances the whole organization by considering both organizations and employees’ needs.
In short, transformational, and situational leadership are essential in the healthcare system. Transformational aims to change a culture of doing things to achieve set goals, while situational leadership theory is required for isolated cases that require unique approaches.
References
Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2013). Strengths-based leadership: Great leaders, teams, and why people follow. Gallup, Inc
Rowitz, L. (2014). Public health leadership: Putting principles into practice. (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Classmate 2: Michelle: Hi Professor and class,
Approach to Leadership
Given a position as a new leader in a public health organization, I will approach the leadership position using a unique style and style to help me achieve the organization’s goals within the required timeline and maintain a peaceful relationship between my team members and me. The first thing I will do is change my mindset and realize myself as a leader and being a leader, and I am supposed to portray all leadership qualities for me to manage my team members very well. Hence confidence, determination, and a strong will to win will always be my key attitudes, making sure I follow them. I will prefer to lead my team members using the transformational leadership style for leadership style.( Seitz & Owens,2021).
Transformational leadership is simply a type or style of leadership. A leader who works with team members to identify the needed change in the organization, create a vision to guide the change, mainly through inspiration, and finally execute the change tandem with committed members of the group. Thus I will value my team more, and I will always involve them in the decision-making process. Hence we will be organizing meetings, and everyone will be allowed to air his or her views (Rowitz, 2014). And in case of any problem among the team members, I will always step in, and we solve it amicably. The other important area of my style of leadership will be communication. Thus I will always be simplifying my information and breaking them down for the members of the team to understand them well and clearly know the vision of our organization, and as you all know, where, there if effective communication and instruction well understood, then the tendency of achieving set goals I always very right, because everyone will be always at the right place, at the right time and doing what he is required to do. (Jian,2021).
I will also practice the act of putting people first or charismatic hence; as a transformational leader and a leader who has great ambitions and visions for our organization, and I will always listen to my team members, address their issues without any discrimination, hence making everyone to feel valued and most importantly, I will be rewarding the ones who perform well, hence boosting the morale of other members so that they can also work more smart knowing that the boss will recognize their efforts and at least reward them (Rowitz, 2014). I will also be taking responsibility when things go wrong and provide constructive criticism to the team members, hence telling them what they are supposed to do or change; when things go right, I will be praising them and telling them to keep on with the spirit.( Çop,et al,2021).
References
Rowitz, L. (2014). Public health leadership: Putting principles into practice (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Jian, G. (2021). EXPRESS: From Empathic Leader to Empathic Leadership Practice: An Extension to Relational Leadership Theory. Human Relations, 0018726721998450.
Çop, S., Olorunsola, V. O., & Alola, U. V. (2021). Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 671-682.
Seitz, S. R., & Owens, B. P. (2021). Transformable? A multi-dimensional exploration of transformational leadership and follower implicit person theories. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(1), 95-109.

Categories
Public Relations

Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to demonstrate the application of change management strategies to achieve health equity at micro, meso, and macro levels using application of a systems thinking tool.
Course Outcomes
This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Explain the various aspects of individual and group organizational behavior, including micro and macro perspectives (POs 7 and 8).
CO 2: Explain leaderships’ critical role in managing and motivating individuals within the work environment (PO 8).
CO 3: Analyze the social and cultural organization dynamics from a leadership perspective (POs 1, 5, and 8).
CO 4: Apply leadership and behavioral theory through research and collaborative projects in healthcare and public health settings (POs 1 and 8).
CO 5: Identify effective management of interpersonal and intrapersonal issues in general and in public healthcare settings (POs 7, 8, and 9).
CO 7: Apply systems thinking principles for resolving organizational problems (POs 7 and 8).
Due Date
Submit your completed application by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5 as directed.
Requirements
In order to prepare your change management paper, you will need to familiarize yourself with systems thinking tools such as are described in your required textbook (Rowitz, 2014). The following resources will also help:
The Systems Thinker – Palette of Systems Thinking Tools website (Links to an external site.)
Peters, D. H. (2014). The application of systems thinking in health: Why use systems thinking? Health Research Policy and Systems, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-51 (Links to an external site.)
The Change Management Paper is worth 250 points and will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.
Create your manuscript using Microsoft Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain College of Health Professions documents.
Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be posted under the Q&A Forum.
The length of the paper is to be no less than 5 and no greater than 7 pages, excluding title page and reference pages.
APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface):
Note: Introduction – Write an introduction to your paper, but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association.
Introduction to the purpose of the change management paper
Description of the means by which structural bias, social inequities and racism undermine health and create challenges to achieve health equity at micro (population/community), meso (public health/organizational), and macro (regulatory/societal) system levels
Description of selected change management theory
Presentation of the structure, process (function), and expected outcomes of selected change strategies to achieve health equity at the described micro, meso, and macro levels using a systems thinking tool of your choosing to address each system level. You will create the visual representation using an appropriate systems thinking tool introduced in the David Peters (2014) article (e.g. casual loop, stock and flow diagram, process map, etc.).
Reflection and discussion of change management evaluation and sustainability
Conclusion
Preparing Your Paper
The following are best practices for preparing this paper:
When introducing the change management paper, be sure to identify the purpose of the paper and the need to consider potential benefits of change management to address threats to health equity in public health.
When describing the means by which structural bias, social inequities and racism undermine health and create challenges to achieve health equity at micro (population/community), meso (public health/organizational), and macro (regulatory/societal) levels, be sure to identify appropriate background information (who, what, where, when, and why) as applies to each threat to health equity.
When describing the selected change management theory, be sure to properly cite the author and source of the theory as well as your rationale for the selected theoretical approach and each step of the selected theoretical model.
4. When presenting the structure, process (function), and expected outcomes of selected change strategies to achieve health equity from a systems perspective (micro, meso, macro), be sure to include a systems thinking tool of your choosing to address each system level.
When reflecting on the selected change management recommendations, be certain to address relevant elements of evaluation and sustainability.

Categories
Public Relations

This essay should be 2-4 pages double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. Font, APA F

This essay should be 2-4 pages double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. Font, APA Format
.
Define urbanization. Describe three pros and three cons for urbanization and include examples. Pick one form of urbanization and describe how that form of urbanization can impact an individual’s health status. Pick a health issue of your choice and describe how urbanization and vulnerable populations play a role in the prevalence of that health issue. Name at least one public health intervention that is used to address urbanization (Describe that intervention and how it is used to address urbanization).
This is what I have written so far.
Urbanization has drastically affected on population’s health and well-being. It impacts the entire population
Urbanization defines what cities grow in society, become more urban, and increase the population in town as far more jobs come to the city expands; as the cities or crowd grows, people tend to move to the outskirt of rural, suburban areas to avoid the group. It started in the industrial revolution when workers moved toward manufacturing. The essay talks about the drastic change that happened in New Orleans’s Gentrification of low-income neighborhood-like areas after Hurricane Katrina came to town and destroyed individual homes. The resident could no longer afford to live in their neighborhood because the rent was expensive majority of the residents were receiving housing assistance during that time. I am from New Orleans, and the community looks completely different now and more expensive. They wanted to lower crime rates in the city by making the residents move out of their housing projects. However, when that happened, it caused the crime rate to rise higher in suburban areas destroying the excellent neighborhood. Now they built towns houses. Some people who lived for 30 years decided to sell their homes and move into a safe place. They wanted to attract more terrorists to the city to make it appeasable to the outside guest visiting New Orleans. When you build new communities, the following community will suffer in the long run.
Talk about What it’s like to get kicked out of your neighborhood” and look at some effects gentrification and displacement can have on the community. The culture, environment, and landscape of the community are changing based on the population. Also, look at some of the effects that it can have on the population itself. What does that mean for the community members, where they are displaced too, how does that affect their overall culture, and what are the pros and cons
Pros Better living conditions or housing facilities sing, growth in taxes for the local government, can increase the cultural diversity or more access to employment
Cons Could lead to poor living conditions to access to quality healthcare, unequal living opportunities or lack of opportunities, crime rate, high taxes.
Another example of a successful business buying up other community buildings and forcing business owners to move out of their communities. So they have more economic advancement in other areas. They will suffer because they can no longer access healthcare, doctor’s offices, hospitals, or convenience grocery stores. Other diseases like diabetes can also affect the population due to access to build healthy lifestyle grocery stores related to food deserts.
Reference
Urban Sprawl and Risk for Being Overweight or Obese
Am J Public Health. 2004 September; 94(9): 1574–1579.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.9.1574
PMCID: PMC1448496
PMID: 15333317
Urban Sprawl and Risk for Being Overweight or Obese
Making the Blue Zones: Neoliberalism and nudges in public health promotion pdf
Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food
deserts literature pdf

Categories
Public Relations

1. Paper Outline showing what topics you will cover in your paper. It is suffici

1. Paper Outline showing what topics you will cover in your paper. It is sufficient to list a sentence or two under each bullet.
Make sure you check the paper instructions very carefully and use them as a guide for your outline.
2. See file for paper instructions.
* Must include cover page and citation of reference page – APA

Categories
Public Relations

This essay should be 2-4 pages double spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. Font, APA F

This essay should be 2-4 pages double spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. Font, APA Format.
Define social determinants of health. How do you feel that social determinants of health play a role in the health status of vulnerable population groups? How can we use some of the lessons learned from past public health contributions, such as the Henrietta Lacks Story, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, or the Stanford Prison Experiment, to introduce public health interventions that will be beneficial for less fortunate populations?

Categories
Public Relations

This assignment is broken up into two parts, Part A: Company Analysis and Part B

This assignment is broken up into two parts, Part A: Company Analysis and Part B: Research and Planning.
In 750-1,000 words, complete both Part A and Part B.
This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Part A
Choose an organization on which you want to base your public relations case study. Select an organization that you are able to access enough information to complete all the parts of this project. Consider options such as a Fortune 500 company, an organization on the Inc. 5000 list, or a large non-profit organization. Seek instructor approval for your selection.
Write a company analysis. Include the following:
A company summary that includes the following: describe the company or organization, what it does, the size of the organization, when were it was founded, and where it is located.
A situational analysis or summary that includes the following: observations on the current state of the business and where it is relative to its goals, any other specific observations such as if the business has been in the news recently or if it adopted a new policy or rule that affects customers, and any general observations related to the organization.
Identify a problem, opportunity, or goal that you could accomplish or overcome through a PR campaign.
Describe what you expect for the outcome of your campaign.
Describe specifically what success looks like for the client, such as 1,000 more social media followers, 300 attendees to the fundraising event, etc.
Include two or more scholarly resources.
Part B
Based on the problem, opportunity, or goal that you wish to accomplish or overcome, that you chose in Part A, identify the following research items:
What type of research information do you need based on the issue you selected for your plan?
How will you use the research results?
What research method might you use to get this information?
Which specific publics need to be researched, focused on, or addressed? Why?
Include two or more scholarly resources.

Categories
Public Relations

Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to assess one’s personal strengths-based leadership from a systems perspective and develop a public health leader résumé and personal vision statement.
Course Outcomes
This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes:
CO1: Explain the various aspects of individual and group organizational behavior including micro and macro perspectives (POs 7 and 8).
CO4: Apply leadership and behavioral theory through research and collaborative projects in healthcare and public healthcare settings (POs 1 and 8).
CO7: Apply systems thinking principles for resolving organizational problems (POs 7 and 8).
Due Date
Submit your completed application by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 3 as directed.
Requirements
In order to prepare your personal leadership paper, you will need to complete your StrengthsFinder self-assessment available through your required textbook:
Rath. T. & Conchie, B. (2013). Strengths based leadership: Great leaders, teams, and why people follow. New York, NY: Gallup, Inc.
The Personal Leadership Paper is worth 250 points and will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.
Create your manuscript using Microsoft Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain College of Health Professions documents.
Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be posted under the Q&A Forum.
The length of the paper is to be no less than 3 and no greater than 5 pages, excluding title page and reference pages (the one-page résumé should be attached as an appendix to your paper).
APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface):
Note: Introduction – Write an introduction to your paper, but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association.
Description of strengths-based leadership findings
Assessment of strengths-based leadership findings from a systems perspective
Prepared one-page public health leader résumé (attach as an appendix to your personal leadership paper)
Creating a personal vision statement, apply principles of leadership, governance, and management by addressing how you might best: (a) empower others, (b) foster collaboration, and (c) guide decision-making as a public health leader.
Conclusion
Preparing Your Paper
The following are best practices for preparing this paper:
When introducing the personal leadership paper, be sure to identify the source and background of the StengthsFinder self-assessment and its relationship to the purpose of the paper.
When describing the strengths-based leadership findings, be sure to identify appropriate background information (who, what, where, when, and why) as applies to your personal findings.
When assessing the strengths-based leadership findings, be sure to fully address identified findings from a systems perspective (micro, meso, macro) with examples to support assertions.
When reflecting on the application of the strengths-based leadership findings, be sure to include the one-page public health leader résumé in your appendix, and creating a personal vision statement, apply principles of leadership, governance, and management by addressing how you might best: (a) empower others, (b) foster collaboration, and (c) guide decision-making as a public health leader.

Categories
Public Relations

As she continues her journey at CSU, Claudia has been asked to teach her fellow

As she continues her journey at CSU, Claudia has been asked to teach her fellow classmates about various learning strategies related to academic success.
Take all of the information that you have learned from the Unit III Lesson and the reading assignments, and create a PowerPoint presentation that helps Claudia teach the other students about achieving academic success at CSU. Click here to access the PowerPoint template for this assignment.
Your presentation should contain the sections listed below.
Include an introduction slide.
Explain how memory relates to learning new information.
Provide information on reading strategies.
Discuss some note-taking strategies.
Discuss the types of learning styles, and state your preference.
Identify the learning strategies that you will use to secure your academic success at CSU.
Include a references slide, and list all sources that were used.
For tips on how to create a PowerPoint presentation, click here to access a helpful tutorial. (Click here to access the transcript for the tutorial)
Prepare a PowerPoint presentation of at least 10 slides. You must include a title slide and a references slide that lists the sources in APA format; however, these slides will not count toward meeting the minimum slide requirement. You must include at least one reference, which can be your textbook.

Categories
Public Relations

Module 1: Discussion (required, graded) You will participate in one discussion t

Module 1: Discussion (required, graded)
You will participate in one discussion this week. There are two different topics presented below, in bolded text. Please choose one of these topics for your discussion this week, address the bullet items under the topic name.
Approach to Leadership
Given a position as a new leader of a public health organization, prepare a brief summary of your approach to the leadership of the organization.
Comparison of Leadership Theories
Analyze the difference between two of the leadership theories discussed in the Module 1 lesson.
Reading: Module 1 Lesson: Overview of Public Health Leadership
Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2013) Strengths based leadership: Great leaders, teams, and why people follow. Gallup, Inc.
Part One: Investing in Your Strengths
Part Three: Understanding Why People Follow
Rowitz, L. (2014). Public health leadership: Putting principles into practice (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Part I: Leadership Theories and Principles
Module 2: Discussion (required, graded) You will participate in one discussion this week. There are two different topics presented below, in bolded text. Please choose one of these topics for your discussion this week, address the bullet items under the topic name.
Systems Level Leadership
At what systems level are you most comfortable in pursuing a leadership position (e.g., micro, meso, or macro)? Explain.
Six Values of Quality in Leadership
Of the six values of quality in leadership, which quality resonates most with your leadership style? Why?
Reading: Module 2 Lesson: Leadership Strategies at the System Levels
Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2013). Strengths based leadership: Great leaders, teams, and why people follow. Gallup, Inc.
Part Two: Maximizing Your Team
Additional Resources:
Taking StrengthsFinder
Leading with your Strengths: A Guide to the 34 Themes
The Research
Rowitz, L. (2014). Public health leadership: Putting principles into practice. (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Part III: Leadership and Preparedness